Putting the Grift in ESG

On the whole, I would rather live in a society was run by cynics than by saints—cynics tend to be less intrusive. However, when cynics ...

BY ANDREW STUTTAFORD Image March 20, 2021

Putting the Grift in ESG

On the whole, I would rather live in a society was run by cynics than by saints—cynics tend to be less intrusive. However, when cynics pretend to be saints, they are playing a dangerous game, as many of those on Wall Street now peddling "socially responsible" investment (SRI) may soon discover. To be clear, I have no doubt that some of those pushing for more SRI (or the closely related concept of stakeholder capitalism) are true believers. Others, perhaps the smartest, are jockeying for positions of power — and the perks that come with it — under a corporatist regime (stakeholder capitalism is essentially an expression of corporatism). Still others are simply following the ancient Wall Street practice of repackaging nonsense and selling it at a profit.

The idea that companies which are run not for their shareholders, but for a somewhat arbitrarily selected group of "stakeholders" and/or goals that someone, somewhere, has determined to be good for society will be more profitable (or less risky) than companies run with a keen eye on shareholder return is, on the face of it, absurd. Even if it were not absurd, the extra fillip that would come from doing well by doing good would be quickly reflected in the share prices of those supposedly virtuous companies, sharply reducing the potential upside for those who got into the game too late (which will likely be most investors).

Nevertheless, turning to Jason Zweig's The Devil's Financial Dictionary (a recent, and entertaining purchase, from which I plan on quoting fairly frequently in the next few months), I see that the first line of Zweig's definition of a stock market is this:

A chaotic hive of millions of people who ...   READ MORE





Steve H. Hanke

Beyond Bitcoin, It's Time for Cryptocurrency Boards

When it comes to sound money, cryptocurrency boards beat Bitcoin. ...

Veronique de Rugy

The Not-So-Stimulative $1.9 Trillion Package

There is no way to justify the size of the American Rescue ...

Charles C. W. Cooke

Why Wouldn't JetBlue Flee New York for Florida?

JetBlue is a business; it's not a tourist board. And, as I'm told, elections have ...

Philip Klein

Chuck Schumer Wants Democrats to Be the Party of Wealthy Elites

Schumer is pushing Biden to remove the $10,000 cap on deducting state and local taxes from federal taxes (known as ...

Andrew Stuttaford

Stirring the Pot: Yogurt, ESG, and Investor Return

On the menu today: priorities, priorities, and Danone's management change, priorities, priorities, genocide, and ...

Kevin A. Hassett

Here's How Much the COVID-19 Stimulus Will Cost You

Fiscal stimulus isn't free. You'll pay for it in future tax hikes. ...


The Case for Nationalism: How It Made Us Powerful, United, and Free

By Richard Lowry

“Makes an original and compelling case for nationalism . . . A fascinating, erudite—and much-needed—defense of a hallowed idea unfairly under current attack.” — Victor Davis Hanson



Learn more about RevenueStripe...
national review

Follow Us & Share

19 West 44th Street, Suite 1701, New York, NY, 10036, USA
Your Preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy
View this e-mail in your browser.


Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Chris Ramsey can take the heat, but what would relegation for QPR mean for black managers in the Premier League?

How a team of innovators overcame the odds to create water from thin air

Britain's health service uses long Twitter thread to explain why it needs more black people to donate blood