pulp non-fiction

The Time Warner Bros. Sketchily Killed An Entire Publishing House

Lately, we've all been hearing about some strange entertainment decisions coming out of Warner Bros. Having taken on debt thanks to a merger, the company's been saving money by killing a bunch of projects that could cost more to market than they'd earn. We're hearing about it because these movies and TV shows have fandoms who care. But this is hardly a new concept, parent companies suddenly pulling the plug on bits of entertainment that are wrapped up and ready to ship. 

At the start of the '70s, Warner Bros. had a publishing division called Warner Modular Publications, Inc. In 1973, Warner Bros. suddenly shut Warner Modular down. For some books that were all written and ready for audiences, this meant a sad fate. While Warner would still pass the manuscripts to other publishers if the contracts said they had to, the books still might end up with far fewer copies printed than planned and no promotion, which would cut off almost everyone from reading them.

So, that's what we can report to you as fact about the end of Warner Modular. The really juicy part, however, and the way we heard about this story, surrounded the alleged reason Warner made this move. For that, as with so many things, we have to turn to Noam Chomsky. 

Chomsky wrote a short book called Counter-Revolutionary Violence: Bloodbaths in Fact & Propaganda. It covered lots of controversial stuff about American action in Vietnam. Just a few years had passed since the New York Times had published excerpts from The Pentagon Papers and had had to defend their right to do so all the way to the Supreme Court, so if this book also contained leaked or classified info, that could complicate things for Warner.

The book contained no such stuff, only analysis and commentary, and editors had approved it. But according to Chomsky, higher-ups at Warner fretted about the book, objected to its angle even after conceding no legal issues existed, and tried to weasel out of the release they'd committed to. Finally, they closed the entire publishing house—so they could bury that one book, claimed Chomsky. 

Even ignoring Chomsky's claim about Warner's motives, it's disappointing that a company should ever bury a work whose rights they own. Luckily, with books at least, you can sometimes count on copies getting saved, distributed, and maybe preserved forever. 

For more stories about stories, check out:

Top image: Warner Bros.
Daily Digest

Is There A Future for Comedy Central?

By Matt Solomon / November 14th, 2022

15 Times Actors Posthumously Starred In A Movie

By Andres Diplotti / November 14th, 2022

Brotherly Love: How DeVito and Schwarzenegger Turned 'Twins' into the Ultimate 1980s High-Concept Comedy

By Tim Grierson / November 14th, 2022

15 Utterly Absurd Legal Defenses That Were Actually Used In Court

By Andrea Meno / November 13th, 2022

Daylight Savings Time Has Nothing To Do With Farmers

By Eli Yudin / November 13th, 2022

fb   tw   yt   Logomark_DIGITAL_Red_50X50-px   insta png   tiktok png
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.
ONE CRACKED FACT | View in browser


Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Chris Ramsey can take the heat, but what would relegation for QPR mean for black managers in the Premier League?

'Game of Thrones' gave fans of Missandei and Grey Worm something to love tonight