America's cruel bird flu response

We failed to prepare, and now animals are paying the price.

Hey readers, It's Marina Bolotnikova here.    The 2022-2023 spread of bird flu has been the most catastrophic on record in the US.    In less than two years, it's hit hundreds of poultry factory farms across nearly every state in the country, costing the federal government $757 million and counting to manage, and the poultry industry more than $1 billion in lost revenue and other costs (experts also fear that the disease could spark an outbreak in humans).   To help stamp out the disease's spread, all of the more than 62 million chickens, turkeys, and other birds raised for meat and eggs on affected farms have been killed and disposed of, whether or not they actually had the virus, which can spread rapidly and has a very high mortality rate for poultry birds.   This fall, bird flu is surging again. So far in October and November, it's infected dozens of factory farms largely in the Midwest, including on turkey farms raising animals for Thanksgiving season — resulting in the extermination of 4 million chickens and turkeys in just a month and a half.    I use the word "extermination" deliberately. Although many outlets have written that the birds on farms hit with bird flu are being "euthanized," the reality of these mass killings is far from the painless end implied by that term.    Last year, I wrote a great deal about the rise of "ventilation shutdown plus" (VSD+), a method being used to mass kill poultry birds on factory farms by sealing off the airflow inside barns and pumping in extreme heat using industrial-scale heaters, so that the animals die of heatstroke over the course of hours.   It is one of the worst forms of cruelty being inflicted on animals in the US food system — the equivalent of roasting animals to death — and it's been used to kill tens of millions of poultry birds during the current avian flu outbreak.    As of this summer, the most recent period for which data is available, more than 49 million birds, or over 80 percent of the depopulated total, were killed in culls that used VSD+ either alone or in combination with other methods, according to an analysis of USDA data by Gwendolen Reyes-Illg, a veterinary adviser to the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), an animal advocacy nonprofit. These mass killings, or "depopulations," in the industry's jargon, are paid for with public dollars through a USDA program that compensates livestock farmers for their losses.   In America's peer countries, ventilation shutdown has been effectively banned because it's so inhumane; last year, Danish bioethicist Peter Sandøe told me he was "shocked" by the method's prevalence in the US and that in the European Union, relying on it would be illegal.    Thousands of US veterinarians, animal welfare experts, and animal advocates have protested the use of ventilation shutdown. But a growing body of evidence obtained through public records requests shows that the poultry industry, in partnership with agricultural and veterinary authorities, is quietly normalizing ventilation shutdown and planning its further use — even though the USDA's own policy says it can only be used as a last resort.   Ventilation shutdown has become a go-to for the poultry industry   USDA regulations specify that VSD+ is meant to serve as a stopgap when one of two other depopulation methods aren't available in time for producers to rapidly cull their farms: firefighting foam, which is sprayed over the birds to suffocate them, or carbon dioxide poisoning (neither of these is painless, especially the former, but both are widely considered less cruel than ventilation shutdown).    But getting access to these methods on short notice requires advance planning — having standing contracts with companies that can supply CO2 gas, for example — that neither the meat industry nor its regulators appear interested in ensuring is in place. VSD+, on the other hand, can more easily be arranged in a pinch because heaters can be rented off-the-shelf from equipment companies. When disaster strikes, livestock producers that failed to prepare can simply say they had no choice but to kill their animals with heatstroke.   In February, Pennsylvania's Department of Agriculture spent $119,000 to buy 14 heaters and related supplies to carry out ventilation shutdown plus during bird flu outbreaks, according to documents obtained in a public records request by AWI and shared exclusively with Vox. Producers seeking to kill their flocks with ventilation shutdown have generally tended to rent heaters on a one-off basis, but Pennsylvania's decision to buy a set of heaters suggests an intention to continue using the method. (The state is the country's fourth-largest producer of eggs and eighth-largest producer of turkey.)   "We know VSD+ heat played a critical [role] in Pennsylvania in 2022 … We are entering a time of heightened risk, and with high [egg farm] density in Lancaster County, PA, need to know such resources are readily available for the region," Pennsylvania's former state veterinarian, Kevin Brightbill, wrote in an email to colleagues last December, discussing the need to procure heaters for ventilation shutdown. (This correspondence was also obtained by AWI.) In February, once the state ag department had made the decision to buy the heaters, Brightbill wrote in an email that they needed to come up with a "non-VSD based justification for purchase of this equipment."    That last point is key — ventilation shutdown was never meant to be a default method, so emergency responders aren't supposed to plan to use it routinely. The USDA's rules are based on the American Veterinary Medical Association's (AVMA) guidelines for depopulating animals, which classify ventilation shutdown plus as "permitted in constrained circumstances," meaning it should only be used if less inhumane methods aren't available. Preferred methods should be used for emergency response planning, the guidelines state, and "less preferred methods should not become synonymous with standard practice." But that's exactly what's happened in the US poultry industry.   Bird flu "is still a very present threat to Pennsylvania's $7.1 billion poultry industry," Shannon Powers, press secretary for Pennsylvania's Department of Agriculture, told Vox in an email responding to a request for comment on the heater purchase. "Each situation that involves making a decision to euthanize animals is evaluated individually to ensure American Veterinary Medical Association approved methods are chosen … Having equipment readily available in the event of an emergency can reduce response time, eliminating prolonged suffering by animals infected with a highly contagious, generally fatal disease, and preventing further spread of the disease."    Why some veterinarians are blaming their own profession   Many critics of ventilation shutdown have blamed the AVMA for enabling the practice. By classifying the method as "permitted in constrained circumstances" (a designation that then became federal policy) rather than recommending against it, they argue, the AVMA has made it possible for factory farms to kill vast numbers of animals with heatstroke and claim they're doing it with veterinary approval.    The AVMA's guidelines have helped create a situation in which "the poultry and egg industries lack any incentive to stop creating the precise 'constrained circumstances' in which the AVMA condones the inhumane method of VSD+Heat," Reyes-Illg, the Animal Welfare Institute veterinary adviser, wrote in a letter to the AVMA in May 2022.    Despite these criticisms, the AVMA hasn't changed its position on ventilation shutdown, and critics say the organization has prevented open discussion about the problems with the method.    In January, the AVMA denied admission to some veterinarians who are critical of VSD+ to its Humane Endings Symposium, a conference on animal kill methods.    "I've been an AVMA member for 11 years. It is my responsibility as a veterinarian to question our profession's role in allowing public funding of heatstroke-based mass killing of millions of animals, a method that should be considered criminal animal cruelty," Crystal Heath, one of the vets who were barred from the symposium, told me. "It is disturbing that such discussions are forbidden."   The AVMA is now at work on the next edition of its depopulation guidelines. It's unclear whether the classification of VSD+ will change, and the AVMA didn't respond to a request for comment for this story.    But it's clear that the current situation is untenably cruel — and that it just isn't necessary. What we lack is not the technology, but the will and moral leadership in institutions like the USDA, the AVMA, and animal agriculture itself to change the norms in an industry that's grown accustomed to unaccountable cruelty.    —Marina Bolotnikova, deputy editor   P.S. If you want to recommend this newsletter to your friends or colleagues, tell them to sign up at vox.com/future-perfect-newsletter. It's getting increasingly dangerous to be a newborn in the US Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images The death rate for American infants increased for the first time in 20 years, according to the CDC. The obstacles mothers face in accessing health care are too often insurmountable, and as this latest data shows, the consequences to American children are dire. Things might only get worse, some experts fear, as financial, political, and social pressures drive providers further from many of the places where they're needed most, writes health reporter Keren Landman.    More on this topic from Vox: A leading cause of maternal mortality is something few moms worry about 3 theories to explain why syphilis rates are exploding among women Why 70 percent of the world's maternal deaths are in sub-Saharan Africa It's time to break up with fast fashion Lorena Spurio for Vox Fashion isn't frivolous — it touches every person on the planet. But the speed and scale of the largest producers in the fashion industry pose major environmental and human rights challenges for the world's poorest of the poor. Future Perfect deputy editor Izzie Ramirez argues why we all should consider buying less from the worst offenders.   More on this topic from Vox: Biden gives center stage to the climate report Trump tried to bury What happens if you force companies to reveal how much they contribute to climate change? Lots of Americans are in the global 1%. A tenth of their income could transform the world. WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT Heidi Wideroe/Bloomberg via Getty Images The new issue of Works in Progress is out, and my favorite article is a comprehensive history of zoning reform in New Zealand. Sounds boring? How could it? It's zoning, and it's New Zealand, two fascinating things. There are volcanos. And also important lessons about accessory dwelling units. —Dylan Matthews, senior correspondent   I recently finished Iain M. Banks's sci-fi novel The Player of Games, the second in his famous — among a certain brand of nerd — Culture series. The Culture, in Banks's futuristic world, is a human civilization that is almost entirely run by mostly benevolent, and very powerful, AI. I say "mostly benevolent" because while the AIs have built a post-scarcity society for the humans in the Culture, free from any kind of want, the AIs themselves are a little creepy, what with their ability to manipulate everything around them. The Player of Games is considered the most approachable entry into the Culture series, which is worth reading for a vision of superintelligent AGI that isn't dystopic — and in fact, can seem close to utopia — but is disquieting nonetheless. —Bryan Walsh, editorial director   If I had known Zvi Mowshowitz's review of Going Infinite — the new book by Michael Lewis about Sam Bankman-Fried — was 28,000+ words, I don't know if I would have taken the time to read it, but I'm glad I did. Mowshowitz worked with SBF at Jane Street Capital before SBF founded Alameda Research and FTX, and so he's able to pick apart Lewis's version of events with personal history, sorting out what's true and what's questionable, and adding lots of humor and sharp insights about effective altruism, crypto, and storytelling along the way. —Kenny Torrella, staff writer  ProPublica's new investigation into how insurance companies deny patients coverage of life-saving cancer treatments, in spite of state laws designed to prevent that very thing, is infuriating and heartbreaking. In one case highlighted in the story, an insurer denied a man access to CAR-T cell therapy, a cutting-edge treatment that fights cancer using cells from the patient's own body, on the pretense that it wasn't a drug, which they would have had to cover by law, but a gene therapy. It's a fascinating example of how the categorization of novel biomedical treatments can intersect with law, politics, and corporate policy to screw over ordinary people. —Marina Bolotnikova, deputy editor   Questions? Comments? Tell us what you think! Email us at futureperfect@vox.com.  Access the web version of this newsletter here.   This email was sent to aymentanaze.news@blogger.com. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox's unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution.   View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service.   Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.